Update
Last updated September 18, 2026
Silicon Valley Bank after the panic, the rescue, and the lawsuits
The bank collapse that triggered a national panic about a new financial crisis in 2023.
Dateline
United States
Editorial note
Compiled by After the Headline from public reporting, court filings, official records, and the sources cited below.
Current status
Depositors were protected and most of the bank was sold, but accountability litigation continues. An August 2026 decision allowed the FDIC to offset the former parent's $1.71 billion deposit claim, and a September Federal Reserve review faulted supervisory inaction and risk-averse culture.
Attention gap
Coverage and case developments
Monthly national-TV coverage is shown alongside dated developments from the story timeline.
Story span
3.5 years
Latest update
September 18, 2026
September 18, 2026
The Federal Reserve released findings that supervisors knew or should have known of SVB's vulnerabilities well before the failure but did not act effectively.
August 28, 2026
A federal court held that the FDIC could fully offset the former parent's $1.71 billion deposit claim.
February 28, 2025
A judge allows SVB's former parent to pursue a separate lawsuit over $1.93 billion in seized deposits.
Deep dive
What happened next
A fuller account of the events, rulings, and records that followed.
Silicon Valley Bank's collapse was one of the defining financial shocks of 2023. The immediate public memory is a digital-age bank run and a weekend rescue operation. But what happened next is what makes the story fit this format. After regulators closed the bank in March 2023, the U.S. government moved to backstop all deposits, even those above the normal insurance cap, to prevent a broader contagion. Soon after, First Citizens acquired much of the failed bank's deposits and loans. That stabilized the headline crisis, but it did not end the story. By 2025, the FDIC had sued 17 former SVB executives and directors, accusing them of gross negligence and breaches of fiduciary duty. A separate court fight also allowed SVB's former parent to continue pursuing a claim over nearly $2 billion in seized deposits. So the fuller ending is not just that the bank failed and somebody bought the pieces. It is that one of the largest U.S. bank collapses in years turned into a still-unfolding argument over who caused it and who should pay for the damage.
Timeline
Key updates
The sequence of major developments, ordered from newest to oldest.
Update
A federal court held that the FDIC could fully offset the former parent's $1.71 billion deposit claim.
Update
A judge allows SVB's former parent to pursue a separate lawsuit over $1.93 billion in seized deposits.
Update
The FDIC sues 17 former executives and directors, seeking billions in damages over the collapse.
Update
First Citizens agrees to buy most of Silicon Valley Bank's deposits and loans from the FDIC.
Update
U.S. officials announce that all SVB depositors will be protected to limit wider financial fallout.
Update
California regulators close Silicon Valley Bank and appoint the FDIC as receiver.
More to read
Related stories
More reporting from the archive.
Trevor Milton and Nikola after the fraud conviction
Milton was pardoned, but his civil and bankruptcy liabilities survived. The Ninth Circuit affirmed Nikola's roughly $168 million arbitration award in February 2026, and a Delaware court in September upheld subordination of Milton's nearly $70 million bankruptcy claim because the pardon did not erase the underlying conduct.
Read storyBed Bath and Beyond collapse and aftermath
Bed Bath and Beyond filed for bankruptcy in 2023, its brand continued online under new ownership, and a new brick-and-mortar return began in 2025 under the Bed Bath and Beyond Home name.
Read storyFTX after the collapse: not just Sam Bankman-Fried, but what happened to the money
The Second Circuit upheld Sam Bankman-Fried's conviction and 25-year sentence in June 2026, and he petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in September. Separately, the FTX Recovery Trust's fifth distribution brought eligible general-unsecured and digital-asset-loan claims to 103% cumulative distributions.
Read storySources
Reporting and records
6 links